The Divine Life

Why We Were Created
a blog by Eric Sammons
October 13, 2010

New Evangelization for Old Christians

Pope Benedict has recently unveiled a new office to promote the “new evangelization” that both he and Pope John Paul II have called for. What does this phrase “new evangelization” mean? After all, as Catholics, we should be rightly suspicious of anything that presents itself as “new” in regard to the Faith, for we believe that the Gospel has been handed down to us through the centuries via Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition and that public revelation ended with the death of the last apostle. We are not Mormons and thus should not accept anything novel or recent when it comes to the content of our Faith, for Jesus Christ was the complete Word and nothing needs to be added to the deposit of Faith.

imagesSo what do the popes mean by “new evangelization”? Simply this: the Church needs to re-present the truths of our Faith to societies which were originally seeped in the Gospel but now have become adrift in secularism. We are called to evangelize the “old” Christian countries such as those in Europe and even here in the Americas. The content of the Catholic Faith has not changed – and will never changed – but how we present it must change as society changes. Beliefs that were assumed in previous generations are now challenged and ideas that were rejected a century ago are now accepted at face value.

What does this mean practically? Let me use an example I recently encountered. My daughter is being confirmed this year and I am teaching a class to her and some of her friends to prepare them for this sacrament. In my research, I was reading a book published in 1922 on the Sacraments of Initiation. At one point the book was referring to the practice of bishops administering this rite as opposed to priests, and the main argument given for this was, in so many words, “because the pope says so.” Now it is true that the pope has authority to make the bishop the ordinary minister of confirmation, but an answer such as “because the pope says so” is simply not going to be accepted in today’s world. A Catholic from a century ago might have accepted this, but most will not today. Some might lament this fact, but it doesn’t change the reality of it. When defending and explaining the teachings and practices of the Church, we must first understand the presuppositions of those we are encountering; if we don’t, we risk speaking past each other or even alienating the person to the Catholic Faith. This often means that before we can even present the Gospel we must first lay the groundwork by explaining the natural law and the truths about the human person.

Of course, the “new evangelization” has the same foundations as the “old” evangelization: prayer, fasting and personal sanctity. I don’t care how you present the Faith, if you don’t base it in a life of prayer, fasting and striving for holiness, your efforts will be fruitless. People of every age are attracted to authenticity, and living the faith is still the best preparation for sharing it with others.

St. Paul, pray for us!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Evangelization,Pope Benedict

  1. I disagree about the idea that we cannot add to the deposit of faith. Every new generation has a different reaction to the doctrine of Christ and must be heard out before we accept or not accept their particular response by the Church in general. A potent example of a “new” thing is the Little Way of St. Therese of Lisieux. Every new saint brings something new to the deposit of faith. Canonization or the achievement of being a Doctor of the Church validates the efficacy of the new idea as created by the saint or doctor. So many devotions are used by the Church which are edifying and essential to the spiritual growth of the modern Catholic and yet may not be like scripture itself, but yet are accepted by the Church as authentic enough for the faithful to be safe. If the only document we could rely on is the Bible we would be fundamentalists. So I see no difficulty in calling something “the new evangelization”. Jesus promotes diversity, even within the Church, and he wants us all to have our own way to him and yet hang together somehow like a gothic church which needs no mortar. So let us not be like the Pharisees, but rather be willing to accept new ideas and yet maintain our integrity.

    Comment by The Reverend Doctor Victoria A. Howard, Anchoress — October 13, 2010 @ 4:46 pm
  2. Sorry Reverened Dr. Victoria,

    We cannot add or subtract anything to the deposit of faith, but that does not mean that we cannot call something “new.” The deposit of faith is the living “Tradition” of the Church passed down(handed down)from Christ to the apostles and the apostles to the Church. As far as the saints or blessed adding to the revealed truth of the faith, neither saint mor anyone could add one iota to the deposit of faith, but rather they reteach or reiterate a truth in a slightly different manner, which may attract or ignite a new spiritual growth. A perfect example of this would be St. Faustina and her devotion to Divine Mercy. She did not add any new revelation concerning the Merciful Father or the teaching concerning God’s infinite mercy tevealed by our Lord. Rather she reminded the faithful of God’s infinite love and mercy.

    As far as new evangelization is concerned, John Paul II and Benedict XVI are truly stating that the church must start anew in re-reaching the faithful in order to revive the Mystical Body in the faith and truth. The Church is missionary by its very nature, so she has to continue to be missionary even to its own body.

    Comment by Imad Thomas Jonna — October 13, 2010 @ 5:45 pm
  3. You are both kind of right. We can add things to the deposit of faith but nothing that is truly new. Things might seem new but they will really be a deeper understanding of old truth.

    Comment by Randy — October 13, 2010 @ 9:09 pm
  4. [...] I wrote about the “new evangelization” that our church leaders are calling for. As I mentioned, [...]

    Pingback by Engaging the culture without embracing it « Divine Life – A Blog by Eric Sammons — October 14, 2010 @ 8:17 am
  5. People, whoever you are, regardless of your glorious titles;
    A true Catholic is one who accepts ALL the teachings of The Catholic Church. If you refuse any ONE of them you really belong to one of the thousands of denominations of christianity. This acceptance of the teaching of The Church usually involves setting aside your pride and accepting a higher authority. In my own case this involves finding the authentic voice of The Church. I accept without doubt, the Pope as #1. After that I start to question, does this speaker agree with the Pope and speak for The Catholic Church.

    Comment by Kevin Kenney — October 14, 2010 @ 4:48 pm
  6. To The Reverend Doctor Victoria A. Howard, Anchoress.

    You may have been a Catholic at one time, but you certainly don’t know anything about the Catholic Church. The fact that you are a minister of two Protestant “churches”, and at least one of them requires nothing more than a fee to be a minister, shows that you are no longer Catholic. As far as your other titles and qualifications, I did some checking. How is it that you can qualify for a degree from a university based on life experiences? Corllins University is nothing more than a degree mill that sends out degrees for a fee. And your doctorate from them is as phony as you are. So don’t try to correct someone who is actually a Catholic. Your response is the same thing I find on the ground in my cattle lot . . . pure BS and nothing more.

    Comment by Ed Kern — October 15, 2010 @ 5:57 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

kvindelige viagra