The Divine Life

Why We Were Created
a blog by Eric Sammons
February 3, 2010

Are youth to be served or to serve?

When I was a teenager, I was very involved in my (Methodist) youth group. It was a wonderful time in my spiritual life, and I am very thankful for all the things I learned during that time. I think there are many Christian adults today who can look back at their time in high school youth group as a time of spiritual growth and advancement. Yet I have to admit that I have for a long time had an uneasy feeling about the culture of youth ministry within the church.

My concerns revolve around two common aspects of many youth groups: the lack of parental involvement and the “consumer” mentality of many of these groups. The fault for the first problem often does not lie with the youth ministers, but with the parents, who consider the parish’s youth group a means to “outsource” their duties to raise their kids Catholic. I’ve known many youth ministers who practically beg parents to get involved to no avail.

But the origin of the other problem – the “consumer” mentality of youth ministry – I think falls more closely to the nature of modern youth ministry itself. I recently ran across an article (entitled “I think I’m doing youth ministry all wrong“) by Tim Schmoyer, a youth minister who articulates my concerns quite nicely (emphasis added):

Despite knowing otherwise in my head, the way I actually lead my church’s youth ministry is mostly from the mentality that our youth ministry is a program or service we provide to families. It’s almost like I’m unintentionally feeding the consumeristic perspective by sometimes using language like, “We offer small groups…” and, “We provide connection points for your teens…” Since when was ministry ever supposed to be about what a paid staff member and a couple adult volunteers are expected to spiritually provide for teens and families?

Youth ministry should not be about how the church can serve the youth or even how we can provide programs that help them grow spiritually. That’s the parents’ responsibility. In fact, I don’t think youth ministry should even accidentally enable parents to outsource their God-given responsibility to us, something I know my ministry is all too guilty of. Support parents, yes, but enable them to outsource? No.

The Greek word for “church” is literally “ekklesia,” a community of believers who are “called out” to serve and edify each other and the people around them.

Instead of fueling the consumerism mentality of what a church “offers” or “provides” and which church in town does it best, youth ministry should probably be about helping teens use their God-given gifts to serve the body. It should teach families that youth ministry isn’t just about what the church does for them, but that they are “called out” to think beyond themselves with a servant’s heart. I bet teen church drop-outs would decrease if they actually served as a valuable and essential part of the local body of Christ.

Note the first section I highlighted: it is the parents’ responsibility to help their children grow spiritually. This cannot be out-sourced. A youth program’s purpose is to simply assist the parents in this task. But it is not the job of the youth program to “sell church” to teenagers. It is to give teens an outlet for practicing the faith that has already been imparted by the parents to them.

I recognize of course that in the real world many, many parents are not doing this job, and many youth ministers are heroically trying to fill that gap as best they can. But no matter what, the focus of youth ministry should be less about making the Church conform to the desires of teenagers as it is making teenagers conform to the demands of the Church.

Evangelization, Parenting, The Church

  1. Very Good!

    When Lifeteen came to town (it has since left), parents were asked NOT to attend the meetings! This progressively irritated me. Eventually, my two eldest kids stopped attending anyway due, partly, to the inappropriate pride of some of the leader.

    We could barely tolerate the Mass, which we were more than welcome to attend. My second daughter did not ever set foot into a Lifeteen meeting. Her adamant choice.

    I think teens should meet with a mixture of service, and being served. I think that’s how we should all be treated.

    I think the observation of consumerism is astute. I remember the comment of our chapel secretary with regards to couples coming in seeking sacraments. The Church is the dispenser of sacraments. People come in and ask. If they don’t like what we offer, they go somewhere else. In one case, a couple which attended the Protestant Chapel, brought their baby to us (the Catholics) for Baptism! Go figure.

    I hear this so often when people discuss their church attendance (or lack thereof).

    So what do we do about it?

    Comment by JP — February 3, 2010 @ 1:17 pm
  2. Many years ago, our parish had a youngish nun as youth minister. Formerly a teacning sister, she did a great job and built up the program. She welcomed parent involvement, and I was eventually dubbed an “assistant lay youth minister”.
    In addition to a guitar Mass, the YM participated in community service, even making trips to a Mexican orphanage, bringing clothing, catechism, and simple friendship to the children there.
    When Sister left, the new YM made it clear he didn’t want any help (even labeled the leaders of the parish Boy and Girl Scout troops (in our diocese considered a part of YM) as homosexuals.
    YM in this parish has not recovered ten years later.

    Comment by Dino — February 3, 2010 @ 2:53 pm

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>