| |
Interpreting the Holy Bible
How the "Senses" of Scripture Provide the Foundation for a Proper Interpretive Stance

Spiritual Sense
The Scriptures, due to their divine inspiration, as well as their
subject matter, can also possess meanings that are beyond the Literal sense.
However, these potential meanings too can only be legitimate inasmuch as they are faithful
to the Literal sense of the particular passage. The senses that are beyond the Literal can
be generally classified under the name "the Spiritual sense". The source of many
of the meanings beyond the strict Literal, especially in the case of the Old Testament, is
the Paschal Mystery. This eternal, central event places all of salvation history, which
the Scriptures relate, into "a radically new historical context"(7).
The three possible senses within the Spiritual are called the more than
literal, the typological, and the fuller.
Like multiple literal meanings, a more than literal sense is possible due
to the dynamic nature of language which does not restrict a text to one possible meaning.
However, now, unlike the multiple meanings possible in the Literal sense, the source of
the various meanings classified as more than literal is the truly new context
of the Paschal mystery and the influence of the Holy Spirit. Referring again to Psalm 22,
one sees that it takes on a new meaning with the crucifixion of the Lord. Christ is the
preeminent example of one who undergoes immense suffering, but in the end, rejoices in the
ultimate victory of God. In fact, Jesus quotes this psalm while hanging on the Cross,
giving authority to a Christological interpretation of it. Further, the new meaning that
Christ affixes to Psalm 22 does not violate the original meaning of the text; rather, the
new brings the old to a higher level.
The second possible Spiritual sense is called the typological. A type is some person,
place, object, or event that represents another such thing due to certain similarities or
differences. The type is recognized after the fact by the introduction of the thing it
represents- the anti-type. For example, Moses is a type of Christ. Moses was the deliverer
of the Old Covenant, Christ is the deliverer of the New Covenant; Moses
establishment of the Old Law involved one nation, Christs establishment of the New
is for all nations. Before the introduction into history of Christ, the anti-type, the
meaning of the text pertaining to Moses did not contain him as a type of Jesus. However,
after the life of Christ, a new meaning was created that is not alien to the original
Literal sense. A type and anti-type can both be contained within the Old Testament or
within the New Testament, or the type may be in the Old and the anti-type in the New. Both
the type and the anti-type must be contained within the Scriptures in order for a meaning
to be typological.
Salvation History is not limited to the time periods of the Bible,
but extends from the creation of Man until the second coming of the Son of Man. The fuller
sense, the third category of the Spiritual sense, recognizes this. "The sensus
plenior is that additional, deeper meaning, intended by God but not clearly intended
by the human author, which is seen to exist in the words of a biblical text...when [it is]
studied in the light of further revelation or development in the understanding of
revelation."(8) Further revelation or development limits this sense
to the later revelation that is present in Sacred Scripture or the development that occurs
within the life of the Church following the closure of the deposit of revelation. A
preeminent example of this would be the doctrines on the Blessed Virgin Mary. Though very
little is said of her in the Bible, years of further reflection on revelation led the
Church to define certain dogmas pertaining to her, to which passages of Scripture could
then be associated (i.e. the "enmity" in Gen. 3:15 as it relates to the
Immaculate Conception).
Thus, due both to divine inspiration and the dynamism of human
communication, especially in the written word, the Holy Scriptures contain various
meanings. A human author, writing without the influence of the Holy Spirit, can
infuse a text with multiple meanings, as can be seen in poetry. In fact, those works
called "classics" are usually ones that allow for the possibility of various
interpretations. As the Scriptures are truly a human form of communication, they have this
ability as well. Further, as they also possess that unique quality of having "God as
an author"(9), they are capable of inexhaustible additional
meanings, none of which, however, conflict with the original meaning intended by the human
writer.
|
|